Maplevisa
Iman Borhanifar, RCIC
Author

Iman Borhanifar, RCIC

Founder & Editor, Maplevisa

Iman Borhanifar is a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) based in Toronto and licensed by the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC). He writes and reviews MapleVisa coverage of Canadian immigration policy, programs, and regulatory developments.

His background includes Canadian immigration consulting, business and management, and legal studies, including common law. He is also a member of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA), Ontario Bar Association (OBA), and Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants (CAPIC).

Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant Toronto, Ontario
Member of:
CICC CAPIC CBA OBA
About Maplevisa
Professional memberships and affiliations of Iman Borhanifar

For Individuals

Canadian Immigration News Applicants and families

Permanent Residence

For Professionals

Professional Updates Immigration consultants and lawyers

Federal Court

Share

Share this page

Email

LMIA Work Permit, Foukeng c. Canada, 2026 CF 1131

In LMIA Work Permit, Foukeng v. Canada, 2026 FC 1131, the Federal Court set aside a visa officer’s refusal of a temporary agricultural work permit application and related misrepresentation finding. The Court found that an incomplete certified tribunal record prevented it from assessing whether the officer’s reasoning was rational and justified.

Temporary Resident Visa, Gill v. Canada, 2026 FC 1121

In Temporary Resident Visa, Gill v. Canada, 2026 FC 1121, the Federal Court dismissed Harjot Singh Gill’s judicial review application as moot after IRCC reopened and redetermined the refused application. The Court granted him 15 days from the September 2, 2026 judgment to file for leave and judicial review of IRCC’s subsequent June 18, 2026 refusal.

Refugee Claim Credibility, Agwata v. Canada, 2026 FC 1124

In Refugee Claim Credibility, the Federal Court dismissed a Kenyan claimant’s application for judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision denying her refugee protection claim. Justice Aylen found the RAD’s April 22, 2025 decision reasonable, including its treatment of new evidence, credibility concerns and the claimant’s sur place claim.

Spousal Work Permit, Kaur v. Canada, 2026 FC 1123

In Kaur v. Canada, 2026 FC 1123, the Federal Court set aside the refusal of a spousal work permit application and related study permit applications for dependent children. Justice Battista found that the officer’s conclusion that there was insufficient evidence of the applicant’s spouse’s qualifying Canadian employment was unreasonable.

Canada Study Permit Financial Requirement 2026

Canada Study Permit Financial Requirement 2026 International students applying for a Canadian study permit on or after September 1, 2026 must show higher funds to cover their first-year living expenses. For a single applicant studying outside Quebec, the required amount has increased to $23,448, excluding tuition and transportation costs. The updated amounts apply across all Canadian provinces and … Read more