Maplevisa
Iman Borhanifar, RCIC
Author

Iman Borhanifar, RCIC

Founder & Editor, Maplevisa

Iman Borhanifar is a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) based in Toronto and licensed by the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC). He writes and reviews MapleVisa coverage of Canadian immigration policy, programs, and regulatory developments.

His background includes Canadian immigration consulting, business and management, and legal studies, including common law. He is also a member of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA), Ontario Bar Association (OBA), and Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants (CAPIC).

Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant Toronto, Ontario
Member of:
CICC CAPIC CBA OBA
About Maplevisa
Professional memberships and affiliations of Iman Borhanifar

For Individuals

Canadian Immigration News Applicants and families

Permanent Residence

For Professionals

Professional Updates Immigration consultants and lawyers

Federal Court

Share

Share this page

Email

Financial Credibility, Et Al. v. Canada, 2026 FC 1217

Desk with files and papers with highlighted text about procedural fairness and bank statements, illuminated by a desk lamp in a legal office.

In Financial Credibility, the Federal Court granted judicial review after finding that a visa officer made an adverse credibility finding about the applicants’ bank balance without giving them an opportunity to respond. The decision concerned a spousal open work permit application and a study permit application. Justice Battista set aside the refusals and ordered redetermination by a different officer.

IFA, Hernandez c. Canada, 2026 CF 1212

Golden balance scale centered on a wooden desk surrounded by stacks of legal documents and bookshelves in the background.

The Federal Court dismissed Neribet Hernandez Hernandez’s application for judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division decision finding that Mérida, Yucatán, was a viable internal flight alternative (IFA) in Mexico. In Hernandez v. Canada, 2026 FC 1212, released October 1, 2026, Justice Negar Azmudeh found the RAD’s reasoning reasonable.

Misrepresentation, Kaur v. Canada, 2026 FC 1216

Immigration lawyer reviewing documents at a desk with a laptop and scales of justice

Misrepresentation was central in Kaur v. Canada, 2026 FC 1216, where the Federal Court set aside a finding that a temporary resident visa holder was inadmissible under section 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The Court found that the procedural fairness letter gave only a general conclusion that a property valuation report was fraudulent, without disclosing the underlying concern recorded in the officer’s notes.