Maplevisa
Iman Borhanifar, RCIC
Author

Iman Borhanifar, RCIC

Founder & Editor, Maplevisa

Iman Borhanifar is a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) based in Toronto and licensed by the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC). He writes and reviews MapleVisa coverage of Canadian immigration policy, programs, and regulatory developments.

His background includes Canadian immigration consulting, business and management, and legal studies, including common law. He is also a member of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA), Ontario Bar Association (OBA), and Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants (CAPIC).

Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant Toronto, Ontario
Member of:
CICC CAPIC CBA OBA
About Maplevisa
Professional memberships and affiliations of Iman Borhanifar

For Individuals

Canadian Immigration News Applicants and families

Permanent Residence

For Professionals

Professional Updates Immigration consultants and lawyers

Federal Court

Share

Share this page

Email

Manitoba Practice Ready Assessment targets 90 doctors

Stacks of folders and documents neatly arranged on an office desk with a window and plant in the background, alongside landscape photos on the wall.

A proposed expansion of Manitoba’s Practice Ready Assessment process could result in up to 90 new family physicians ready to work in the province by 2028-2029. The Manitoba Practice Ready Assessment project would support internationally trained medical graduates seeking to practise family medicine, with a focus on rural, remote and northern communities.

PRRA Oral Hearing Challenge Dismissed

A professional woman sitting at a large desk in a law library reviewing documents amid stacks of papers and law books on shelves behind her.

The Federal Court dismissed a challenge to the refusal of a pre-removal risk assessment (PRRA) application, finding that a PRRA oral hearing was not required. In Lenga Et Al. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1261, Justice Anne M. Turley found the officer had assessed insufficient evidence of risk rather than made an adverse credibility finding.

Federal Court Denies Removal Stay in Refugee Appeal Case

A brass balance scale is centered on a wooden desk surrounded by thick stacks of legal documents and papers with highlighted passages.

The Federal Court denied a removal stay in a refugee appeal case after finding that the applicant’s challenge to the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision was plainly out of time. In Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1246, Justice Lafrenière also found that the applicant had not shown irreparable harm ahead of his scheduled October 16, 2026 removal.

Federal Court Upholds PR Refusal Over TRV Misrepresentation

Brass balance scale sits on a wooden desk surrounded by stacks of legal documents with highlighted sections in a law library filled with books.

The Federal Court has upheld the refusal of a permanent residence application in the Spouse or Common-Law Partner in Canada Class after an officer found that false marital information in an earlier temporary resident visa application amounted to TRV misrepresentation. The Court dismissed the judicial review application on October 8, 2026.

Federal Court Upholds Refugee Identity Document Findings

Two legal professionals examine identity documents spread out on a large wooden table in a law library filled with books.

The Federal Court has dismissed a judicial review application challenging the Refugee Appeal Division’s refusal of a refugee claim over conflicting identity documents. In Niyomugabo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1239, the Court found the RAD’s assessment of the applicant’s refugee identity documents and credibility was reasonable.

Work Permit Misrepresentation, Xu v. Canada, 2026 FC 1236

A woman in a formal suit writes notes at a desk covered with legal documents and binders in a law library.

In Work Permit Misrepresentation, Xu v. Canada, 2026 FC 1236, the Federal Court dismissed two judicial review applications challenging IRCC decisions that refused a work permit and permanent residence application following a finding of misrepresentation. Justice Southcott found the work permit inadmissibility decision reasonable and the processes leading to both decisions procedurally fair.

Federal Court Upholds CEC Refusal Over Job Genuineness

Brass balance scale centered on a wooden desk surrounded by large stacks of legal documents and papers in a law library with shelves of law books behind.

The Federal Court has dismissed a challenge to the refusal of a Canadian Experience Class permanent residence application after finding the IRCC officer reasonably questioned the genuineness of the applicant’s claimed work as a data administrator. The CEC employment genuineness dispute centred on evidence about the employer, the applicant’s background and inconsistencies in the materials provided in response to a procedural fairness letter.