Maplevisa
Iman Borhanifar, RCIC
Author

Iman Borhanifar, RCIC

Founder & Editor, Maplevisa

Iman Borhanifar is a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant (RCIC) based in Toronto and licensed by the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants (CICC). He writes and reviews MapleVisa coverage of Canadian immigration policy, programs, and regulatory developments.

His background includes Canadian immigration consulting, business and management, and legal studies, including common law. He is also a member of the Canadian Bar Association (CBA), Ontario Bar Association (OBA), and Canadian Association of Professional Immigration Consultants (CAPIC).

Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant Toronto, Ontario
Member of:
CICC CAPIC CBA OBA
About Maplevisa
Professional memberships and affiliations of Iman Borhanifar

For Individuals

Canadian Immigration News Applicants and families

Permanent Residence

For Professionals

Professional Updates Immigration consultants and lawyers

Federal Court

Share

Share this page

Email

Refugee Durable Solution, Anenya v. Canada, 2026 FC 1149

The Federal Court granted judicial review in Refugee Durable Solution, Anenya v. Canada, 2026 FC 1149, after finding that a refugee applicant was denied procedural fairness in the assessment of whether she had a durable solution in Ethiopia. Justice Aylen set aside the March 19, 2025 refusal of the applicant’s overseas permanent residence application and ordered redetermination by a different officer. Before a new decision is made, the applicant must have an opportunity to provide further evidence and written submissions on the durable solution issue.

Work Permit Refusal, Singh v. Canada, 2026 FC 1147

In Work Permit Refusal, Singh v. Canada, 2026 FC 1147, the Federal Court dismissed a judicial review application after finding that an immigration officer reasonably concluded the applicant had not shown he would leave Canada at the end of his authorized stay. The decision was issued on September 11, 2026.

PR Card Destruction, Yilbas v. Canada, 2026 FC 1139

The Federal Court allowed a judicial review of IRCC’s decision to destroy a permanent resident card that had been returned as undeliverable. In Yilbas v. Canada, the Court found the PR Card Destruction decision unreasonable because the officer’s record did not intelligibly address whether the notice requirement in section 58(3) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations had been met.

TR To PR Pathway Status, Ihenyen v. Canada, 2026 FC 1143

The Federal Court dismissed an application for judicial review of a refusal under the TR to PR Pathway Status requirement. The Court found that the applicant was required to hold valid temporary resident status both when the permanent residence application was received and when it was approved, and did not have valid status when the officer made the decision in December 2024.

Refugee Durable Solution, Yosief v. Canada, 2026 FC 1130

In a Refugee Durable Solution ruling, the Federal Court set aside the refusal of Ghebriel Yosief’s permanent resident visa application under the Convention Refugee Abroad or Humanitarian-Protected Persons Abroad Class. The Court found the officer did not meaningfully address evidence that refugees’ formal right to work in South Africa was not accessible to the family in practice.

IFA, Montano Riascos v. Canada, 2026 FC 1113

The Federal Court dismissed an IFA challenge brought by a Colombian family after finding the Refugee Appeal Division reasonably concluded that an internal flight alternative was available in Colombia. The September 1, 2026 judgment found that the RAD had addressed the applicants’ circumstances as Afro-Colombians, including evidence of systemic discrimination.