Maplevisa
CANADIAN IMMIGRATION NEWS

Latest Canadian Immigration News

Latest Canadian immigration news, policy changes, program updates and Federal Court decisions, with practical context from authoritative sources.

Mandamus – Citizenship, Hussini v. Canada, 2026 FC 1122

In Mandamus – Citizenship, the Federal Court dismissed Mubarak Abou Hussini’s judicial review application as moot after his citizenship application was granted. However, Justice Catherine M. Kane awarded him $2,000 in costs, finding that the extensive and unexplained processing delay amounted to special reasons for an exceptional costs award.

LMIA Work Permit, Foukeng c. Canada, 2026 CF 1131

In LMIA Work Permit, Foukeng v. Canada, 2026 FC 1131, the Federal Court set aside a visa officer’s refusal of a temporary agricultural work permit application and related misrepresentation finding. The Court found that an incomplete certified tribunal record prevented it from assessing whether the officer’s reasoning was rational and justified.

Temporary Resident Visa, Gill v. Canada, 2026 FC 1121

In Temporary Resident Visa, Gill v. Canada, 2026 FC 1121, the Federal Court dismissed Harjot Singh Gill’s judicial review application as moot after IRCC reopened and redetermined the refused application. The Court granted him 15 days from the September 2, 2026 judgment to file for leave and judicial review of IRCC’s subsequent June 18, 2026 refusal.

Refugee Claim Credibility, Agwata v. Canada, 2026 FC 1124

In Refugee Claim Credibility, the Federal Court dismissed a Kenyan claimant’s application for judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision denying her refugee protection claim. Justice Aylen found the RAD’s April 22, 2025 decision reasonable, including its treatment of new evidence, credibility concerns and the claimant’s sur place claim.

Spousal Work Permit, Kaur v. Canada, 2026 FC 1123

In Kaur v. Canada, 2026 FC 1123, the Federal Court set aside the refusal of a spousal work permit application and related study permit applications for dependent children. Justice Battista found that the officer’s conclusion that there was insufficient evidence of the applicant’s spouse’s qualifying Canadian employment was unreasonable.